On the 1/2/2021, both the prosecution and the defence counsel adopted their respective written address and the case was adjourned for Judgment which could not delivered within time due to JUSUN strike and subsequent vacation until today. The defence counsel in his adopted written address, formulated one issue for determination, that is:“Whether having regard to the leaky evidence of the prosecution coupled with the incontestable defence of the Defendant, the court could hold that the prosecution has mandatorily proved its case to a standard of beyond reasonable doubt as required in criminal.” The prosecuting counsel also formulated one (1) issue for determination which is hereby reproduced as follows:“Whether from the totality of the evidence adduced by the prosecution, could it be said that the prosecution proved its case against the accused person beyond reasonable doubt as required by law.” For the purpose of this Judgment, this court has adopted the sole issue as formulated by the prosecution with some little paraphrasing as follows:“Whether from the totality of the evidence adduced before the court, the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt against the Defendant.” The case of the prosecution against the Defendant for the offence of Armed Robbery contrary to Section 1(2) of the Robbery and Firearms (Special Provisions) Act Cap R11 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004, is as presented by the Page 4 of 21