The prosecution raised a lone ground of appeal vide Notice of Appeal dated 15/7/2013 and filed on the 16/7/2013. I, The ground of Appeal is as follows: I) ERROR IN LAW "The learned trial magistrate erred in law when he held that the prosecution witness number 1 should not answer a question put to him in re-examination by the appellant's counsel which is aimed at explaining the contradictions elicited during his cross examination by the ~espondent's counsel." (' 1 .,✓'), ··, y;,11 The prosecution went on to fo rmulate the following determination in its brief of argument dated 23 rd issue for day of December 2013 and filed on the same day. "whether the trial chief magistrate court (sic) was right in upholding the submission of the defence counsel and ruled that P.W.1 should not answer a question put to him in re-examination which was aimed at resolving a contradiction elicited during his cross examination." In response, the respondent formulated the following issue for determination: 4 /