On the 10/2/2021, parties adopted their respective written addresses and the case was adjourned for Judgment. But because of the JUSUN that started strike in the early April, 2021 which lasted for about two {2} months, the judgment could not be delivered within the period permitted by the constitution. During the adoption of parties respective written addresses, the prosecution urged the court to convict the defendants as charged, while the defence counsel on the other hand, urged the court to discharge and acquit the defendants of all the three {3} counts charges. Counsel to the 1st and 2nd defendants in his adopted written addresses, formulated one {1} issue for determination and is hereby reproduce below:“Whether from the facts and circumstances of the case and exhibits tendered, the prosecution has proved the charges against 1st and 2nd defendants beyond reasonable doubt.” Counsel to the 3rd defendant also formulated one issue for determination and is hereby reproduced below as follows:“Whether considering the totality of the evidence led before this Honourable Court, the prosecution has proved its case against the 3rd defendant beyond reasonable doubt.” The prosecuting counsel on the other hand, formulated two {2} issues for determination and are hereby reproduced as follows:1. “Whether the prosecution has discharged its burden of proving the offences beyond reasonable doubt 4