adduced before a trial court with a view to give it a probative value or quality. - Haruna V. AGF {2012} 9 NWLR 419 - Ubochi V. State {1993} 8 NWLR pt 314 p 697 - Effia V. State {1998} 2 NWLR pt 537 p 275 - Mogaji V. Odofin {1978} 4 SC 91 - Eyiboh V. Abia {2012} 16 NWLR p 51 - White V. Jack {1996} 2 NWLR pt 431 p 407 Evaluation of evidence and ascription of relevant probative value thereto, is the primary duty of the trial court which had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses. It is only when the issue at stake is narrowed down to the inference to be drawn from proved facts without going into the rigour of determining credibility of witnesses that the appellate court could rightly intervene to re-evaluate the evidence especially where the findings are parse. - Haruna V. AGF {supra} - Martins V. State {1997} 1 NWLR pt 418 p 355 - Onuoha V. State {1989} 2 NWLR pt 101 p 23 - Borishade V. FRN {2012} 18 NWLR pt 1332 p 347 - State V. Ajie {2000} 11 NWLR pt 678 p 434 Page 15 of 25