The learned silk submitted that the 1st issue is distilled from ground 2 of the appellant’s grounds of appeal, while the 2nd issue is distilled from ground 3 of the appellant’s grounds of appeal. No issue was formulated in respect of ground 1 of the appellant’s grounds of appeal as some has been abandoned. Like the appellant’s counsel, the respondent’s Like the appellant’s counsel, the respondent’s counsel also formulated 2 issues for determination in this appeal and are hereby reproduced below as follows:The defence counsel in his adopted written address, formulated only one (1) issue for determination at paragraph 3.1.1 of his adopted written address and is hereby reproduces as follows:“1. Whether the trial court has rightly discharged the respondent in view of the failure of the prosecution to prove each and every ingredient of the offences of criminal misappropriation and criminal breach of trust beyond reasonable doubt.” “2. Whether the trial court has properly evaluated the evidence placed before it in arriving at its decision to discharge and acquit the respondent?” The facts of the case that gave rise to this appeal are straight forward and simple. Sometimes in 2016, the nominal complainant who testified Page 4 of 25