Nwobike’s case, the Supreme Court dealt with the powers of the EFCC to prosecute economic crimes which is the subject matter in this application. The decision is very in equivocal. On the whole, we urge the court to grant this application because the Judgment will go a long away in ensuring that the EFCC do the needful. S.H. Sa’ad Esq: We are opposing the grant of the application of Defendant/Applicant, admit doing so, we have filed a 33 paragraphs counter affidavit. We rely on all the averments contained therein. Attached to the said counter affidavits, are 12 exhibits marked as Exhibit 112 respectively. We also rely on all the exhibits attached thereto. Attached to the counter affidavit is a written address and we humbly adopt the said written address as our oral legal argument in urging the court to dismiss the Applicant’s application as lacking in merit. By way of adumbration, the counter affidavit of the Respondent, at paragraph 47.0 the case of Nwobike SAN, stipulated the last for ascertaining if a Criminal conduct can be regarded as economic and finance is crimes and since no further affidavit, we urge the court to deem our counter affidavit as having been admitted. - APC V. INEC (2014) LPELR 24036 (SC). At paragraph 41.0 we submit that the court should look at the case mentioned in that paragraph. Page 5 of 31