2 (c) The sum of N3,500,000.00 (Three million, five hundred thousand Naira) being the cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle which is presently beyond repairs. (d) General damages arising from the Plaintiff’s lost of revenue accruing to the bus assessed at the sum of N10,000,000.00 (Ten million Naira). (e) Exemplary damages to the tune of N2,000,000.00 (Two million Naira). (f) Interest on the judgment sum at the conservative rate of 28% per annum from the date of judgment until final liquidation of the judgment. (g) Such further reliefs as this Hon. court may deem fit to make in the circumstance of this case. (h) Cost of this action. In his final written address, the learned Plaintiff’s counsel formulated one issue for the determination of the court, thus: “Whether the Plaintiff has proved his case and is entitled to all the reliefs sought.” Advancing his argument on the issue, he submitted that the evidence led by the Plaintiff is left unchallenged and therefore, it should be deemed admitted. He placed reliance on the cases of Uzondu v. Uzindu (1997)9 NWLR (pt. 521) 466 at 481; Odogwu v. Odogwu (1992)7 NWLR (pt.253) 344 and Mirchandani v. Pinheiro (2001)3 NWLR (pt.269) 573. Appreciating his claim to be that of negligence, the learned counsel drew the court’s attention to the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Hamza v. Kure (2010) All FWLR (pt.539) 1070 at p.1085. He argued that since the defendant