permitting or authorising the affected Hon. Justice of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court respectively, to conclude the matters they commenced, but could not conclude before their elevations. The principle laid down and stated in the two (2) cases that a Judge elevated or appointed to a higher court would cease to be a Judge of the court from which he was elevated and would therefore lack the requisite statutory provisions (sic: jurisdiction?) allowing or authorising him to do so, is still extant and applicable in appropriate cases. It is, however not, applicable in the Appellant’s case since the provisions of Section 369(7) (sic: 396(7)) of the ACJA specifically permit and authorise the Hon. M. B. Idris, JCA, to sit in the lower court as a Judge of 17