(a). That the accused was entrusted with property or with dominion over it. (b). that he: (i) misappropriate it, or (ii) converted it to his own use, (iii) used it, or (v) Disposed of it, (c). That he did so in violation of (i) Any, direction of law, prescribing the mode in which the trust was to be discharged, or (ii) Any legal contract expressed or implied which he had made concerning the trust, or (iii) That he intentionally allowed some other person to do as above. (d). That he acted as in (b) dishonestly. See ONUAHA V. STATE (2706) SC. In NWOBIKE V. F. R. N. (supra) also following the earlier decisions in the cases of NYAME V. F. R. N. (2010) 7 NWLR (PT. 1193) 344 and AHMED V. F. R. N. (2009) 13 NWLR (PT. 1159) 536, the apex Court was emphatic that by virtue of the combined provision of Section 6, 7 (1) (b) and (2) (f) and 13 (2) of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment) Act, 2004, the Economic and Financial Crime Commission has power to investigate, enforce and prosecute offenders under the Act or any other Statute so far as the offence relates to commission of economic and financial crimes. It is beyond any pre adventure that Criminal Breach of Trust is an offence under Section 311 of the Penal Code and thus criminalized by law. Also apparent is the fact that the criminal action is intended to gain some benefit. Similarly, the summary of evidence accompanying the charge CA/S/114C/2022 Page 12