Individually, the prosecution witnesses were subjected to cross-examination by the defence and reexamination thereafter, the defence opened its defence and for which there witnesses gave evidence. DW1 is one Kunle Kabir who gave evidence for the defence on oath. He testified that he was the one that the PW1 and PW2 met when they got to the Accused house and that when he told the accused person that he had visitors, the accused declined to see them on the ground that he was not expecting any visitor(s) on that day but later decided to see them when he told him that it was his clerk. He further told the court that he witnessed the discussion between the accused person and the PW2 and that no money was received by the accused person from the PW2. Thereafter is DW2, a staff in the court of the Accused who also gave evidence on oath to the effect that the accused person sat in court on the 18/09/2003 being Friday but ordered her to adjourn all the cases for that day due to absence of the parties and their counsel. She further stated that the Accused was around the court the following day to look for the files of some cases he had handled but had no access to the court but left instructions for her to send those files to his house whenever she has access to the court. DW3 and the last witness to the 6