is likely to be breached, may apply to the High Court for redress. - Hassan V. EFCC {2014} 1 NWLR pt 1389 p 607 - Ransome Kuti V. AGF {1985} NWLR pt 6 p 211 - Fajemirokun V. Commercial Bank {Nig} ltd {2009} 5 NWLR 588 By paragraph 3:8 of the applicant’s adopted address, the applicant submitted that from the affidavit evidence, the grounds upon which the application is brought which were tied to the reliefs sought, the applicant has placed all the vital and reliable evidence showing that the applicant’s fundamental rights as guaranteed under sections 36(1), 35(4), 35(5) (a), 42(1) (a) of the CFRN 1999 as amended and Articles 3, 4, 5 and 7 (a) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights 1979, have been breached. In paragraph 3:9 the applicant’s counsel further submitted that by the depositions in the supporting affidavit, the applicant was detained in the custody of the 2nd respondent from 6th and 7th day of December, 2020 in lieu of his younger brother without any lawful justification or cause. It was also the contention of the applicant’s counsel that the 1st respondent did not lodge any complaint whatsoever against the applicant before the 2nd respondent on which the 1st respondent can arrest and detain the applicant. - Ogu V. State {1996} 9 NWLR pt 366 p 1 - Nemi V. State {1994} SCNJ 1106 - Controller General of Nigeria Prison Service V. Dr. Feme Adekany {2002} 15 NWLR pt 90 p 362 8