discrepancies in their oral testimonies when compared with their statement at state CID herein, Exhibits C and D PWs 4 and 5 stated defendant use to put his penis in their vagina and anus, however in their evidence before the court they added after a year that the defendant apart from putting his finger in vagina and anus he use to also put his penis in their vagina and anus and asked them to such his penis all this is not contained in Exhibits C and D. Learned counsel submitted further that at paragraph 3:33 PW4 in Exhibit C stated that she was together with her friend we went to buy recharge card and we saw the defendant who blocked the road and invited me inside his room after we reach he removed his and removed my pant and put his fingers inside my vagina he is doing that at least ten to fifteen time.” Learned counsel further submitted that it is clear PW4 never mentioned that PW5 was asked to sit on a chair, while the defendant is laying down on 3 seater. Even when the matter was fresh in their memory 2 weeks from the time of the alleged ------- and now after a year all this stories are cooked up. In his submission at paragraph 3:36 – 3:47 of their adopted written address, the defence counsel submitted that, PW5 never stated in Exhibit D that she was threatened by the defendant so also PW4 never mention hat in Exhibit C PW5 never testified before this court or in Exhibit D that she informed her parents but rather it was PW4 Faiza’s mother that discovered it and come to tell her parent. Defence counsel in paragraph 3:38 of their adopted written address submitted that the law is trite that where a witness gives oral evidence Page 5 of 23