1. “Whether the prosecution has proved all the essential ingredients of the offence of armed robbery beyond reasonable doubt? 2. Whether the prosecution has proved all the essential ingredients of the offence of causing grievous hurt beyond reasonable doubt? 3. Whether the prosecution has proved all the essential ingredients of the offence of conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt?” The prosecution on the other hand, formulated one (1) issue for determination at paragraph 2.1 of their adopted written address and is hereby reproduced as follows:“Whether the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt regards been had to the evidence adduced before this Honourable Court?” For the purpose of this Judgement, this Court has adopted the sole issue as formulated by the prosecution because the issue has property embodies all the three (3) issues formulated by the defence counsel and is hereby reproduced as follows:“Whether the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt regards been had to the evidence adduced before this Honourable Court?” The case of the prosecution against the two (2) Defendants, are as presented by the evidence of the three (3) prosecution witnesses and the exhibits tendered before this Court. Page 4 of 22