the Defendants contrary to Section 25 (1) (a) of the Act beyond reasonable doubt and I so hold. On Counts 2 and 4 of the charge contrary to Section 132 of the Penal Code Act Cap 532 Laws of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja against the Defendants, the prosecution must establish beyond reasonable doubt the following elements or ingredients: (a) That the Defendant personated a public servant, or that he pretended to hold the post of a public servant; (b) That he was not such a servant , or did not hold the post pretended; (c) That he acted falsely or that he know that he did not hold the office in question; (d) That he, when assuming the character, did or attempted to do something under the colour of his assumed office. In the instant case, by the evidence of PW1, Ibrahim Mohammed Bomai, he testified that on the 18th August, 2015 at about 9:15pm, he received a phone call from someone that introduced himself as Honourable Ndanusa, a Commissioner with the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC). PW1 further testified that the Hon. Ndanusa, i.e. (1st Defendant) told him that he would be sending two of his officers to PW1 with exhibit 3. And the two officers from the said Honourable Ndanusa i.e. one Solomon Adakwu (now at large) and the 2nd Defendant, Nsa Oyok 39