DW6 testified that at the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) office he was shown the original allocation letter of Pax Education Resource Limited which he confirmed signing. In respect of the allocation of Fine Trust Academy, DW6 stated that the signature on the allocation letter of Fine Trust Academy looks like his signature but he cannot confirmed it because the allocation is laminated. He further stated that as the Zonal Manager in-charge of lands, he cannot know all the details of the Applicants that applied for land. He then testified that the application of Pax Education Resource Limited was a replacement. He then stated that he is not aware of the application form for land by P.T.A (Nigeria) Limited but only know of the allocation letter of Pax Education Resource Limited. In conclusion, exhibit 22, the Abuja Municipal Area Council policy file of Fine Trust Academy was admitted in evidence through DW6 by the prosecution. At the conclusion of cross examination and re-examination of DW6, the defence concluded its case and the case was adjourned for address. On the 17th April, 2018 parties adopted their final written addresses and the case was adjourned for judgment. However judgment could not be delivered within the three months statutory period due to the official engagement of the trial Court both within and outside jurisdiction and the absence of the 1st Defendant on the ground of bereavement. Hence the case adjourned today for judgment. Be it as it may, in the final written address of the prosecution, the learned prosecuting Counsel submits two issues for determination: (1) Whether prosecution proved the alleged offence against the Defendants beyond reasonable doubt? (2) Whether from the available evidence before this Honourable Court a case of wrongful conversion of Plot SS1 Jikwoyi Extension III had been established and whether the Honourable Court can order restoration of same to the victim of the crime (the Nominal Complainant)? 12

Select target paragraph3