Educational Resource was substituted with the name PTA. The 1st Defendant is not a shareholder or Director in either PTA or pax Educational Resources.” DW1 further testified in –chief thus:- “ I Reverend Father Dr. Pius Ajike is the Chief Executive and Director of Pax Education Resource.” Then under cross examination by the prosecution DW1 testified as follows:“ I was directed by the church to apply for the land. All along I was acting for the church.” DW1 under cross examination by the prosecution testified thus:“Pius Ajike and Catholic Church are one and the same. The Directors of Pax Education Resource are also the same as Catholic Church.” DW1 testified once again thus:“I am the alter ego of Pax Education Resource but it goes with the church. It is correct PTA (Nigeria) Limited belongs to me. It is equally for the church.” In both his evidence in chief and cross examination by the prosecution, DW1 has been consistent that he is the owner of both PTA (Nigeria) Limited and Pax Education Resource. He also testified that both PTA (Nigeria) and Pax Education Resource are incorporated entities but he cannot remember when Pax Education Resource was incorporated except when shown the documents. Then DW1 was confronted with Exhibit 10, the particulars of Directors of PTA Nigeria Limited and he testified as follows:“I can see exhibit 10. My name is not on the list of Directors of PTA Nigeria Limited. PTA Nigeria Limited has three Directors. It is correct I am not one of the Directors but I am the Chief Executive.” At this juncture, DW1 became completely unstable and uncoherent by being confronted with exhibit 10. Hence, by 48

Select target paragraph3