oral order to assist Himma Abubakar in the delivery of military wares to NAF. That his dealing was with Himma Abubakar and not with SEI Nigeria Limited. The witness stated that when he first reported to EFCC he reported to STF1 where he made a statement and also appeared before STF2. That his interaction with STF1 leader was like an oral interview where Mr. Sharu told him that they were interested in funds under investigation and that they were not after him but after recovery. If the Defendant agree to make refunds there will be no need for further interaction. The statement of the Defendant to the STF1 dated 2/2/16 was admitted in evidence as Exhibit Z7. The Defendant insisted that he was tele-guided in making his statement before the EFCC. No re-examination, DW1 was discharged and that is the case for the defence. Thereafter parties were ordered to file their respective addresses which were duly adopted by respective learned counsel on 30/4/2018. 18