On the issue of prosecution suppressed the Defendant’s statements, it is submitted that the case file that was transmitted to the Legal Department which was vetted and which resulted into the filing of this instant charge was by STF2 headed by CSP Ibrahim Musa and members of his team. The prosecution team were not handed over any duplicate case file by STF1, which equally investigated the Defendant. That there was no deliberate plan by the prosecution to suppress the statement of the Defendant. It is submitted that the prosecution has proved its case against the Defendant beyond reasonable doubt as required by law. Court is urged to find the Defendant guilty as charged and convict him accordingly. The Defendant’s counsel filed a 16-page reply on points of law dated 16/4/18 wherein counsel in response to paragraph 2.2 to 2.4 of the prosecution’s final address, submitted that there is no report of findings of the alleged committee on the Audit of Defence Equipment Procurement (CADEP) tendered and admitted in the trial before this court to substantiate and confirm the assertion made or support the purported evidence in the cited 30