Learned Prosecuting Counsel submits that based on the evidence the Prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt that the Defendants committed the offence for which they are charged. That arguments of the defence holds no water and cannot exonerate them of the offence of cheating, cheating by personation etc. Learned Counsel canvasses that the ingredients of the offence of cheating have been sufficiently proven against the Defendants. That the Defendants in this case deceived the PW1 under the pretence of helping him to secure a job with NSCDC. That the evidence of the Prosecution is corroborated by Exhibit B. That the main element of cheating being fraudulent intention and deceit has been proved. That the Prosecution reasonable doubt. has proved its case beyond The prosecuting Counsel also adopted her Written Address in opposition to the Motion. She canvassed that Section 220 of ACJA is clear on what can render a Charge liable to be struck out. That the Charge has not breached any rule of duplicity of offence misjoinder neither has it occasioned a miscarriage of justice. That the initiation 20