judgment in one of the cases for the PW2. And that the visitation of Accused person in his house by PW1 and PW2 was meant to consummate the demand and that the Accused actually took a step in furtherance of the demand by adjourning the matter slated for judgment as promised PW2. The Accused’s confessional statement exhibit 6 before the court is equally being relied upon by the prosecution in proof of their case and accordingly urged the court to convict the Accused on count 1 as charged. However, the defence submitted contending otherwise, and further stated that none of the six prosecution witnesses testified to the fact that the Accused made any demand of N100, 000.00K any other sum from Dr. Isidore Nnadi (PW2). That there is nothing in the evidence to show that Accused met with the PW2 (norminal Complainant) the communication was only between PW1 and PW2 and it was submitted for the defence that PW1 was never appointed by the Accused as a-go between for the purpose of any such money demand. This is piece of submission by the defence is less than impressive, taking into account the comments of the defence witness DW1 when he stated referring to the coming down to sitting room to receive visitors; 9