said he lost money but the 2nd Defendant offered to give the nominal complainant’s his property at Asokoro. The 1st Defendant testified that the nominal complainant husband said he was interested and enquired how much to which the 2nd Defendant answered N60,000,000.00. The 2nd Defendant produced the title of document of his Asokoro property and gave same to the nominal complainant’s husband, although the 1st Defendant testified she wasn’t there when he did so. She however testified that PW1 confirmed from Abuja Geographic Information system (AGIS) that the title documents was genuine. The nominal complainant said she likes the land and asked to keep the title documents pending the time he rallied round to get the money for payment. The 1st Defendant testified that the 2nd Defendant had returned the draft cheques to nominal complainant’s husband. The 2nd Defendant subsequently reported the returned of the draft cheques to her. The 2nd Defendant subsequently reported the status of the transaction to the nominal complainant who said she will go and verify the property by herself. When the nominal complainant got to Abuja Geographic Information System (AGIS) for the verification, the title documents were seize from her. The 1st Defendant stated in her evidence that the property is situate by AIT Asokoro Extension. She only recalls one of the properties put up for sale by Ad-Hoc Committee which is at Asokoro opposite Skye bank. She testified that the balance of the facilitators’ fee was declared to the nominal complainant’s husband who told her to hold unto the money until he sort out the 2nd Defendant. She stated in her evidence that when the nominal complainant could not get the properties and the amounts, he accepted the offer of the 2nd Defendant’s property. She however does not know whether the nominal complainant executed any agreement with the 2nd Defendant in respect of the 2nd Defendant’s property. Under cross – examination, the 1st Defendant stated that based on the relationship she has with the nominal complainant, she (Nominal complainant) believes in what the 1st Defendant said and what the 1st Defendant brings to her. She is not a staff or agent of Ad-Hoc Committee on sale of Government properties. She admits making several statements to the Economic and 21