9 He urged th e cou,rt to believe the evidence of the Defendant which he described as unchailenged and uncontroverted and to discharge and acquit him. Adm ,TWT6'iN oft he l oft he Defen dant. 'T1IVT]r" - the TVI'T. Theobjectionofthedefencetotheadmissibilityofthe statements made to the E.F.C.C by the Defendant is based essentially o three grounds, (L) of inducement with the promise that he adryitted owing the money, things will be easy for him (2) the statement..Tw,rl,, and "TWT2" were recorded by question and answer sessions (3) every time he made a payment he was given a paper to write a statement leading to the making of a "T'wT3", "TwT4,,, ..T'wr5,, and..Tw1r6,, . In his evidence in the trial within trial, the investigating officer, denied promising the Defendant anything and that it was after the Defendant was shown the petition written against him, Exhibit ..B,, and the 4greement he entered into with the Cooperative, Exhibit 6GA'' that the "TwTl" and that when his boss wanted clarification as to the contents of "TWTI", the Defendant was requested to make "Tw'T2" for clarification. He explained that he only put Defendant voluntarily made questions to the Defendant regarding the introduction of himself and that otherr;yise the other parts of the statement were not done by question and answers. I r.\ -f