The Defendant further linked PW3 with a woman who he says was working in the Friday and Monday Company and spoke with her through phone. The woman asked her and the Defendant to meet her in the Nicon Hilton at the Capital Bar. PW3 went to Nicon Hilton with the operatives of the EFCC but the woman did not show up and her phone was switched off. The following day Mr. Jimoh (the Defendant) came to PW3’s house, by then the EFCC operatives were around the house; they came in and arrested the Defendant with the box. It is instructive to state that this piece of evidence as regard to Exhibit A was never contradicted by way of cross-examination by the Defence. Now on a charge of conspiracy, the prosecution must establish the following ingredients: 1. That there was an agreement between two or more persons. 2. That the agreement was to do or cause to do an illegal act or, 3. To do a legal act by illegal means. A cursory look at the evidence of PW1, PW2 and PW3 shows clearly that there was an agreement between the Defendant and one Hajiya S.A. Sunusi (now at large) to do an illegal Act. Accordingly, I hold that the prosecution have been able to proffer credible evidence to warrant the Defendants conviction on Count 1. 12