(e) Is his confession possible? (f) Is it consistent with other facts which have been ascertained and have been proved. It is the contention of the prosecution that all the above conditions are all present in the statements of the Defendant admitted. Further submitted that a critical look at the evidence married with the said exhibits, they have successfully passed the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the case referred to, especially Exhibit B1 and B2 amount to confessional statement and the court can conveniently convict the accused assuming there are no other corroborative evidences because they point conclusively to the fact that the Defendant committed the offence. On the whole, learned counsel urged the court to hold that the prosecution has proved her case beyond reasonable doubt and the Defendant be convicted accordingly. I have carefully considered the processes filed, evidence of PW1, PW2 and PW3 and submission of learned prosecution’s counsel. This court do adopt the issues formulated by the prosecution counsel for determination.: 1. Whether the prosecution has proved the essential elements of each of the counts of offences alleged against the Defendant beyond reasonable doubt to warrant his being found guilty and consequently convicted. 10