(a) (b) (c) The confessional statement of the accused, or Circumstantial evidence; or Evidence of eye witness. She relied on the case of EMEKA V STATE, (2001) 14 NWLR (pt 734) page 666 at 683 and section 135 of the Evidence Act, 2011(as amended). In relation to Count 1 for the offence of obtaining money by false pretence the learned prosecuting Counsel enumerated at page 4 of her final address the ingredients of the offence as provided by section 1(1) (a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006 and submitted that the prosecution has proved the said ingredients. She relied on the cases of ALAKE V STATE (1991) NNLR (pt205) page 567 at 591, ONWUDIWE V FRN (2006) 10 NWLR (pt985) page 382 at 429-430 paragraphs G-C. The learned prosecution then referred me to the testimonies of PWs 2,5 and 7 to the effect that the Defendant obtained a right of occupancy over property situate at FCT Plot No L84 within Dape District from PW7 under the false pretence of carrying out revalidation at Abuja Geographic Information System on behalf of Haruna Audu Mamza, PW5. The learned prosecuting Counsel submitted that instead of the Defendant to carry out the revalidation of the Plot at Abuja Geographic Information System, he sold out the property at the cost of N3,900,000.00as a bona fide owner to Maryam Buba, PW2. The learned prosecuting Counsel strongly relied on the evidence of PW2, the property 10