agent that bought the plot L84 Dape District from the Defendant and after payment of N3,900,000.00 by PW2, the Defendant signed all the necessary documents and handed it over to her. At pages 7,8 and part of page 9 of the final written address of the complainant, the learned prosecuting Counsel submitted to the effect that the evidence of PW1, the investigating officer in this case corroborates the testimonies of PWs 5 and 7. The learned prosecution Counsel also relied and referred me to exhibits 1,1 (a), 1(b) as well as exhibit 2 admitted in evidence through PW6 to the effect that based on exhibit 1, 1(a), 1(b) and 2, PW1 obtained specimen signatures from the Defendant and Lamar Abbagana along with the affidavit in exhibit 3, the application for re-certification and reissuance of certificate of occupancy contained in exhibit 2 and then forwarded same to the forensic Unit of the Head of Operation. The learned prosecuting Counsel referred me to the forensic expert report exhibits 4 and 8 respectively. The learned prosecuting Counsel then submitted that the testimony of PW4, the forensic document examiner based on its findings and conclusion is that the author of the known signature on documents marked A- A5 also made the signature on the disputed signature marked X-X1. The learned prosecuting Counsel therefore contended that the evidence of PWs 1,3,4,5 and 7 constitute direct evidence against the Defendant. She further relied and referred me to exhibit 5, the 11