NWLR pt 126 p 64. We therefore we urge the court to call that there is no specific denial in the counter affidavit as they are only bunch of general denial. On the written address of the Respondent, the cases cited by the Respondents, are cases of Court of Appeal which cannot override the decision of the Supreme in the case of Dr. Joseph Nwobike SAN V. FRN decided in December, 2021. The few Supreme Court cases cited by the Respondent were decided before Nwobike’s cases. By the principles of stare decision, Nwobike’s decision is not only binding on this court, but also binding on the Supreme Court unless it is set aside. Where there is conflicting decisions, the later prevails. In reply to paragraph 2.0 of Respondent’s written address reference was made to S. 221 of ACJA to show that objection cannot be raise during proceedings, ACJA 2015 is not applicable to this court as it has been domesticated and the applicable law is ACJL 2019. The motion is not challenging the charge, but we are challenging the competence of the EFCC to prosecute. In response to paragraph 4.1.0 of the written address o f the Respondent, we submitted that the case cited by the Respondent that is marine’s was a case that originated in Nwobike’s case, and we further submit in respect of paragraph 4.3.0 that there can never be possible where all the facts of 2 cases be the same. What the court looks at, are the principles developed in the case. In Page 4 of 31