TESTWIDE (NIG) & ANOR 20 LPELR s2493 (CA); STATE V ISAH & oRs (2012) LPELR- 1ss19 (SC). RESOLUTION The Appellants formulated a broad issue which encompasses the two issues of the respondent, even though the appellant submitted that the issues do not emanate from the grounds or judgement and that they are more than the issues of the appellant. I have examined these issues for determination and grounds contained in the notice of appeal filed on 2913122 and I disagree with that submission. The issues emanate from the judgement especially the ground 1 of the notice of appeal which covers it especially the particulars of error in 1, 2, B & 9; while ground 2, pafticulars 5 & 6 covers the two issues for determination. I also do not agree that two issues are far more than the sole issue formulated by appellant to apply the law they are encapsulated in the Appellants sole broad issue. In any event as earlier stated the sole issue of the appellant is sufficient for resolution of the issues herein. There are 10 charges against the appellant, as stated in page 151-155 of records. The issues at play here are; whether in convicting the defendant, the learned trail court took into account and followed the laid down procedures for admissibility of the exhibit p3 -confessional statement and Pl- the video and the applicability in the judgement. cA.AS.40C.2022 13 lPagc