shop to buy sticks of cigarettes and tom - tom. The defe ndants were not wearing face masks on the day of the incident. She equally saw the 2 nd de fendant on the night of the incident but she had never seen him before rhat day. st After the I defendant was arrested and detained , she was ca ll ed by the pol ice to come to their station. She went and identified the 2nd defendant as dne of the men who robbed her. That it was the I st defendant that informed the p~lice about the nd involvement of the 2 defendant in the robbery . The other two members of the gang were not caught by the police . She does not know thr'l11 . Under cross - examination, PWI stated that she did not know the full names of the st I defendant before the robbery incident. She admitted telling the police the I st defendant ' s name. She claimed that she made enquiry about the I st defendant and someone told her his name. The person that told her the l st defendant ' s name was r.ot at the scene of the robbery but that person was the l st defendant ' s acquaintance. st She did not see the l defendant on the day she reported the robbery incident to the police. She admitted that she reported the robbery incident to the police before she st was told the I defendant ' s name . She admitted that on the day of the incident, it was dark and there was no electricity light. On that day she identified only two of the armed robbers . She identified the l st defendant because of the torch light he had put on. The light from the torch refl ected on his face . She flashed her own torch light at the robbers before the 2 nd defendant snatched it from her. That was when she saw the 2 nd defendant ' s face . She maintained her evidence that the 2 nd defendant pointed the gun at her H.nd kicked her. That he had a pistol but she did st nnt know the colour of the pistol. She did not give the 1 defendant money, but the 2 nd defendant was collecting money and other items from her. That nobody opened the compound ' s gate. The robbers scaled the wall fence into the compound. The robbers attacked her rrt her shop. ~,he admitted that none of the items and money that were stolen was recovered from the robbers . She admitted that she did not nd know the 2 nd defendant prior to the robbery incident. That she saw the 2 defendant on the robbery incident because of the light from the torch light. She stated that she told the police that she knows the defendants . That she told the nd police the I st defendant' s name but she did not know the 2 defendant ' s name. She did not describe the 2 nd defendant to the police because she could not identify him. That it was the 1st defendant that informed the police about the involvement of the 2 nd defendant. She does not know one Vincent Okafor. She does not know ~ 1 3 /